RE: “PEPE Passing On Da Right…..Man!”🐸 My Actifit Report Card: June 17 2026

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Sometimes, the owner of a song sues the creator of a cover of his/her song for copyright even if it is because of the cover artist which made the owner's song actually popular !INDEED. 🤔🤯🤯😆

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!PEPE

hive-193552 actifit aliveandthriving alive inleo liketu sgslife appreciator creativecoin marlins mediaofficials upfundme lifestyle actnearn photography trdo oc helpiecake liv apx point innerblocks amazingnature dcooperation zzan dblog aaa lassecash sportstalk cent pob vyb pimp Pepe movetoearn move2earn
0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

That's pretty sad and small minded if you ask me. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!HOPE
!INDEED
!PEPE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

The owner could have just formed a partnership with the cover artist who made the original song actually successful (such as with a more-or-less 50% share of the profits) !INDEED. 🤔🧘‍♂️🤯🤓

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!PEPE

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Yes, they could have done that. They could also have just felt thankful that someone thought that their song was worth to cover, and thanked them even. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!HOPE
!INDEED
!PEPE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

If they did such partnership, both original owner and cover artist would benefit from both popularity and revenue !INDEED, which is a win-win. 🤔🤯🤓 Some original creators seem to really not want it though. 🤯🤯

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Indeed, and I've noticed. Mutual benefit, and win-win dynamics, are not something they don't tend to like. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

They have to realize first though their own benefit from such potential partnership before they engage with it. 🧘‍♂️

!PIXY
!ALIVE

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

That's true, and unfortunately many seem unaware or oblivious to such benefits. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!PIXY

0
0
0.000
Reply