RE: Kodak Box 620 - First 8 Photos

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Is the film very expensive? I don't even try order it for people cause it such a hassle to get and the cost is too high unless you are a hobbyist who would pay more for some fun :P

The photo quality is very good though, I think if you have a stand and the right iso it might be even sharper than digital? Even so it is a auto vintage effect so who doesn't like convenience until you need to develop.

You experiment shots came out well and I agree the first one with the " wrong" light came out the best . !PIZZA !LOLZ !LUV

photofeed filmphotography photography creativecoin neoxian palnet photocircle kodakbox kodakbox620 blackandwhite
0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar
(Edited)

Actually the film isn't that expensive, the cheapest one was only 5,50€. And the 120 size black and white developing (17,90€) wasn't that bad either, not cheap but not too expensive. The scanning of the 120 size film (20€) was expensive though. So all and all my 4€ camera purchase is turning to be quite an expensive hobby since I can't use regular 135 film which would only be about 20€ developed and scanned. That is, if I continue photographing regularly. But then again it may be that the next time I develop something is when I've taken one photo a month so dividing about 50€ to 8 moths isn't that bad.

The size of the scan in tiff photo is about 40 to 50 MB, 7836 X 5224 and resolution 300 px/inch. The 120 negative is obviously much larger than a regular kino film and the store has really good scanning equipment so I think you're right, with right conditions and clean lens I could get sharper photos than with my Sony.

I meant to, but forgot to add the prices of everything! I'll add those to the post since not that many people have seen the post yet.

0
0
0.000
Reply