Happy and unhappy trees
So I thought: can trees be happy or unhappy?
Strictly speaking, trees don't have the ability to feel emotions like humans or animals. Trees are plants that are incapable of experiencing happiness or unhappiness in the sense that we humans do. Trees may have various needs and conditions that are necessary for their growth and health, but they cannot experience emotions. This is due to the fact that trees do not have a nervous system that is necessary for perceiving and experiencing emotions.
On the other hand, what prevents us from personifying trees?
For example, the tree in the first photo is probably unhappy. He's actually almost dead. Standing for years in snow, wind, or full sun is no mean feat.
Tak mě napadlo: můžou být stromy šťastné nebo nešťastné?
Striktně řečeno, stromy nemají schopnost cítit emoce jako lidé nebo zvířata. Stromy jsou rostliny, které nejsou schopny prožívat štěstí nebo neštěstí v tom smyslu, jak to pojímáme my lidé. Stromy mohou mít různé potřeby a podmínky, které jsou nezbytné pro jejich růst a zdraví, ale nemohou prožívat emoce. Je to způsobeno tím, že stromy nemají nervový systém, který je nezbytný pro vnímání a prožívání emocí.
Na druhou stranu, co nám brání tomu, abychom si stromy personifikovali?
Například strom na první fotce je asi nešťastný. On vlastně bude skoro mrtvý. Ono stát roky ve sněhu, větru nebo naopak v plném slunci, to není žádný med.
This tree, on the other hand, enjoys the winter. Maybe. A little. Perhaps. Let's hope so.
Tento strom si naopak zimu užívá. Možná. Trochu. Snad. Doufejme.
How about... mistletoe? Mistletoe is actually a parasite, so it actually hurts the tree. Or is it the other way around, and the mistletoe lives in symbiosis or at least in a "neutral partnership"? In the third photo, the tree is literally covered in mistletoe, and yet it doesn't look like it's hurting it too much. Maybe he's happy anyway.
Co třeba... jmelí? Jmelí je vlastně parazit, takže vlastně stromu ubližuje. Nebo je to jinak, a stom se jmelím žije v symbióze nebo aspoň v "neutrálním partnerství"? Na třetí fotce je strom doslova porostlý jmelím, a přitom nevypadá, že by mu to příliš ubližovalo. Třeba je i tak šťastný.
In the last photo the trees look like they are happy. Because happy is the one who has someone to lean on, to hold him up. And it doesn't matter if one is white and the other is green. (Can trees be racist?)
Na poslední fotce stromy vypadají, že jsou šťastné. Protože šťastný je ten, kdo má někoho, o koho se může opřít, kdo ho podrží. A nezáleží na tom, že jeden je bílý a druhý - třeba zelený. (Můžou být stromy rasisti?)
https://twitter.com/70912305/status/1605532413127405568
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people( @pavelsku ) sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.
Wonderfull
This really reminds us that nothing is lost forever I think tree is the important results and nature as well it really important to the world and everybody should take care of it I hope you enjoy your day have a great weekend dear
There is so much to learn from nature
Though they are not humans but still they respond to changes
Trees can definitely detect more than we realized. But I don't understand how they could be sentient. But that doesn't mean they aren't...
That first tree is pretty miserable, if any tree can be :(
This post has been manually curated by the VYB curation project