RE: Closer, and seeing differently
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Love the diamonds on what looks like the flower's lady parts in those middle pictures. I suppose it is inappropriate to refer to someone else's flower pictures as having lady parts, but I assure you it is complimentary. :)
0
0
0.000
I'm not at all offended by your reference to my flower photo's lady parts, and I think the flowers themselves would also not take issue with such references...however human women might.
As for the diamonds, they say they are a lady's best friend right? It makes sense these flowers are adorned with them.
I suppose whether the comparison is offensive to a woman might depend on the type of flower. The ornate details of a dandelion flower, or the silky petals of a rose surely must be complimentary. The flower of a pitcher plant...well, that one might be offensive ;)
I think flowers may wear their diamonds more beautifully than any of us humans.
Note to self: Don't make pitcher plant references.
I think you're right...but I also believe I know some humans who sparkle like diamonds. (Not that many, but some.)